A breakdown of the development costs of hybrid mobile applications versus natives

There are several factors that affect the cost of Mobile App Development , such as:

·         The scope of the project, platforms and devices, back-end services and technologies.

·         The type of application Development Company.

·         Marketing costs and costs beyond development

How much does it cost to build an infographic application?

For many companies, large and small, the cost is paramount when looking for mobile application development services and the determination of the development approach plays an important role in the decision-making process. Should I choose a hybrid development approach or choose the development of native applications? Depending on your business objectives and general objectives, this decision could make or break the success of your mobile strategy.

This article will compare the cost of developing hybrid mobile and native applications. Does the development of hybrid applications really cost less? What are the drawbacks? At the end of this article, you will better understand what the best approach for your business is.

There is no fixed price for the development of applications; however, there is a misconception that the development of hybrid applications is always less expensive than the development of native applications. This is not always the case. Actually, there are many drawbacks in the development of hybrid applications that affect the price of your project.

Here is a breakdown of the two application development approaches and their unique factors that affect the cost.

Native mobile applications are created for specific platforms and are written in the languages ​​that the platform accepts, for example, Swift and Objective-C for iOS and Java applications for native Android applications. Native applications have the best performance and are the most used in the applications market, since users prefer them to web or hybrid applications because of their speed and responsiveness. These types of applications are more interactive, intuitive and offer a better overall user experience.

The development of native applications is the most expensive option, since it is programming its application for each respective platform (iOS and Android) instead of using the same code base for two platforms.

It is easier to maintain two code bases for two applications than one code base for two applications. With the development of native applications, it has fewer dependencies for errors to occur because it does not trust a cross-platform tool such as Tamarin or Cordova.

Hybrid applications

The development of hybrid applications can do essentially everything HTML5 does, except that it also incorporates native application functions. An envelope acts as a bridge between platforms to access native features. A hybrid application consists of two parts. The first is the backend code created with languages ​​such as HTML, CSS and JavaScript. The second one is a native shell that can be downloaded and loads the code through the web view.

The development of a single application for all platforms is an advantage of the development of hybrid applications, since it is usually faster, allowing faster time to market. But while the development of hybrid applications is faster than native development, it also has a major disadvantage, since you cannot customize your application the way you could with a native application. The more customization you want within your hybrid application, the more expensive and, therefore, a native solution will be more profitable.

A web guide vs. hybrid. Vs. Development of native applications

Hybrid applications also access hardware through a bridge that can slow down development and can also be a frustrating experience for the user, since the application is not designed for the specific operating system.

Does the development of hybrid applications really cost less?

The development of hybrid and native applications could be said to require the same amount of effort and why. With the development of hybrid applications, you must deal with the problems that arise from both native systems and hybrids, which makes troubleshooting difficult.

The mobile developer, Rona Shastra, argues the disadvantage of having to wait for the external developer of the hybrid tool to implement the bridge to the new features of the operating system when it says that "with the development of hybrid applications, we depend on a cross-platform development. Tool like Tamarin or Córdoba. Every time new functions are released in the UI kit, we must wait for the tool to back it up. When you develop a hybrid application, there is an additional layer over which you have no control that can increase the chances of errors. "

Explains that errors are a big concern for the development of hybrid applications when working with the most recent features that have been released for a particular operating system, which negatively affects the cost of development, since it can extend the timeline development.

Can you support Hybrid with internal web developers?

Many people think that they can support their hybrid application in the company with their web developers on the site. However, the reality is that these web developers must understand the native functions of iOS and Android in addition to web development. This means that you have created a more complex application that will need two different skill sets to support it. Developers with this experience are hard to find and much more expensive to retain. This goes for REACT Native too. You cannot simply accept REACT Native only with web developers.

Bringing hybrid development into the company is not always the cheapest option. We recommend that you find a native application development partner to help you develop a team of developers who have the experience for your mobile application.

It all comes down to the user experience

Most users will try a mobile application only once or twice after having a poor user experience with the first attempt to use the application. For this reason, it is important to make sure that your application works consistently to avoid abandonment after the first use.

How much does it cost to build an application: other costs to consider?

Native applications win the performance battle for a landslide. A native application is faster and more reliable by nature. It has all the structure, content and visual elements ready to be displayed at any time, providing a more fluid experience.

In addition, with the development of hybrid applications, the appearance of your application may vary from one user to another, depending on the version of the software you are using and the type of device your application runs. As a result, your application may not always look the way you want it to be, and it can be a bad experience for the user.

When it comes to the cost of mobile app development, you finally get what you pay for.

Although the initial cost may be higher with a native application, you will end up saving a lot of time and money in the long term. By offering an excellent user experience, better performance and the use of device features, you can offer your users a more personalized experience. The combination of the advantages of the native mobile application will result in higher conversion rates and, ultimately, increase customer loyalty. If you are looking for a more detailed breakdown, in this article we describe the benefits of developing native mobile applications.